If you’re unfamiliar with this series, check out my first Project Defensive Score Sheet post. This one’s a day late, but these numbers are pretty ugly, so I doubt anybody was exactly giddy with anticipation.
Let’s start with the table:
If you’re unfamiliar with this series, check out my first Project Defensive Score Sheet post. This one’s a day late, but these numbers are pretty ugly, so I doubt anybody was exactly giddy with anticipation.
Let’s start with the table:
|
SIMILARITY vs. POMEROY
|
||||
|
GAME
|
POMEROY
|
SIMILARITY
|
||
|
Syracuse
|
-
|
Gonzaga
|
Syr +8.5 (78%)
|
Syr +11 (84%)
|
|
Ohio St
|
-
|
Georgia Tech
|
OSU +4.5 (68%)
|
OSU +7.5 (77%)
|
|
Maryland
|
-
|
Michigan St
|
MD +3.5 (64%)
|
MD +9 (81%)
|
|
West Virginia
|
-
|
Missouri
|
WVU +2.5 (60%)
|
MU +3 (62%)
|
|
Wisconsin
|
-
|
Cornell
|
Wisc +8.5 (82%)
|
Corn +2.5 (61%)
|
|
Pittsburgh
|
-
|
Xavier
|
Xav +1.5 (56%)
|
Xav +2 (57%)
|
|
Purdue
|
-
|
Texas A&M
|
Pur +0.5 (51%)
|
Pur +4.5 (69%)
|
|
Purdue w/o Hummel
|
-
|
Texas A&M
|
Pur +0.5 (51%)
|
A&M +3.5 (79%)
|
|
Duke
|
-
|
California
|
Duke +8 (78%)
|
Duke +9.5 (82%)
|
SCORE | YR | TEAM | NCAA W's |
94 | 2007 | Kansas | 3 |
94 | 2005 | Louisville | 4 |
93 | 2008 | Kansas | 6 |
93 | 2004 | Cincinnati | 1 |
93 | 2004 | Connecticut | 6 |
92 | 2008 | Memphis | 5 |
92 | 2007 | Texas A&M | 2 |
92 | 2004 | Gonzaga | 1 |
92 | 2009 | Gonzaga | 2 |
92 | 2006 | Florida | 6 |